Adding 1.21 Gigawatts to Applications with RabbitMQ

James Titcumb (27.Jun.2015 at 14:30, 45 min)
Talk at Dutch PHP Conference 2015 (English - US)

Rating: 4 of 5

Adding 1.21 Gigawatts to Applications with RabbitMQ

Who are you?

Claim talk

Talk claims have been moved to the new Joind.in site.

Please login to the new site to claim your talk

 
Comments closed.

Comments

Rating: 4 of 5

27.Jun.2015 at 15:49 by Andrew Marcinkevičius (25 comments)


Rating: 4 of 5

27.Jun.2015 at 18:47 by Ronald D. (42 comments)


Rating: 4 of 5

27.Jun.2015 at 23:19 by Gorka López de Torre (20 comments)

Live demos would have rounded this to a 5/5 as an introduction to RabbitMQ, though I understand that some technical problems made it impossible. Great talk, despite of this, and a big plus to make a vagrant machine to test it out available for the audience.

Rating: 5 of 5

28.Jun.2015 at 14:35 by Onno Marsman (78 comments)


Rating: 1 of 5

28.Jun.2015 at 17:32 by Anonymous

The title is written in a click-bait-ish way. Just say it's a basic introduction to RabbitMQ and what you can do with it. Speaker even included an installation slide, and went on to explain the RabbitMQ API instead of its concepts and ideas, and the problems it solves. The room reserved was too big for this narrow talk.

Rating: 3 of 5

28.Jun.2015 at 21:18 by misiaq_com (14 comments)


Rating: 4 of 5

29.Jun.2015 at 12:19 by Pim Widdershoven (29 comments)

I do work already with RabbitMQ but the internals were somewhat unclear for me. Thanks for clearing that up!

Rating: 4 of 5

29.Jun.2015 at 12:19 by Robin Speekenbrink (48 comments)

I really liked the structure, style of presenting and various strategies shown. I would have liked more time to see more practical uses and caveats, but all in all: great introduction with enought mystery still to dive into it in my own time :)

Rating: 4 of 5

29.Jun.2015 at 13:37 by Pieter Meyvaert (104 comments)

I did not attend the talk, but wanted to point out that it was great that you had a slide up explaining who the talk was for, and for who it was not!

Rating: 4 of 5

29.Jun.2015 at 14:01 by Renan Gonçalves (14 comments)


Rating: 4 of 5

30.Jun.2015 at 10:13 by Cliff Odijk (16 comments)

Great talk! But the title was a bit misleading.

© Joind.in 2018